Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Workforce Staffing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

San Diego Community Power accepts AB 2561 vacancy report, cites low attrition

San Diego Community Power Board of Directors · June 25, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its June 25 meeting the board accepted staff’s AB 2561 report on vacancies, recruitment and retention, which said Community Power had 28 open positions during the fiscal year, filled 20, has three currently open roles and an attrition rate near 3%.

San Diego Community Power’s Board of Directors on June 25 accepted a staff report required under California Assembly Bill 2561 detailing the agency’s vacancies, recruitment and retention efforts.

Timothy Mangleott, senior director of finance and risk, told the board the agency had 28 open positions in the fiscal year, 20 of those were filled and three positions were open for recruitment at the time of the meeting. "Community Power does have a really low attrition rate. Our attrition rate is near 3% and has been improving over time," Mangleott said.

Mangleott said AB 2561 requires local agencies to hold an annual public hearing and report on staffing status; staff recommended accepting the report and did not propose any policy or procedural changes. When a director asked for baseline comparisons to other local agencies, Mangleott said the packet did not include comparative baselines but cited an example, saying San Francisco’s attrition had been closer to 15%.

Board members thanked staff for the report and discussed whether staff should return with comparative figures; one director asked the agency to provide "more hard figures" on how the attrition rate compared regionally. With no public comments, the board moved, seconded and adopted the recommendation to receive the AB 2561 report.

The board’s action was procedural: it opened and closed the public hearing required by AB 2561, received comments (none from the public at the meeting) and accepted the staff report. No staffing policy changes were adopted.