Waterford leaders debate paid economic development position and approve planning budget

At a Waterford meeting, members debated whether to expand the town’s economic development staffing and approved the Planning & Zoning FY27 budget as presented.

The discussion centered on whether the town should begin with a part‑time economic development specialist placed under the Planning & Zoning personnel line or move immediately to a full‑time position. One member proposed adding a $60,000 ceiling to the personnel line to allow for a full‑time hire if the town chose to pursue that option.

Mark, the town’s newly promoted director of planning, described the transition in his office as “going very well,” said staff have been supportive and noted heavy development activity in town. He explained the proposed economic development role would be funded from the Planning & Zoning personnel budget even though the duties would be assigned by the Economic Development Commission.

Proponents argued a full‑time job would attract more qualified candidates and could produce a measurable return on investment by expanding the town’s commercial tax base. One board member said setting a higher ceiling would give the town flexibility to recruit a candidate with the needed experience.

Opponents urged caution given current staffing needs and recent reductions in state and federal revenues. Several members emphasized the need to prioritize building official hires and to “walk before you run,” leaving open the possibility of adding funds later if the part‑time approach proved insufficient.

A motion to include a $60,000 ceiling for a potential full‑time economic development hire was moved and seconded; the matter was decided by voice vote. Multiple members voiced support, while Selectman Rob (recorded in the transcript) said, “No, I’m gonna say no.” The chair recorded the tally as a 2–1 voice vote with the motion passing.

Despite the passage of that motion, the chair repeatedly noted budget priorities and said any further changes would be considered through supplemental appropriations if justified later.

The Planning & Zoning FY27 budget was then approved as presented by voice vote in the amount spoken during the meeting: $699,654.

What’s next: Board members suggested the Economic Development Commission return in a few months with updates on activity and any evidence that additional full‑time staffing is warranted.