Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Variances topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DuPage County zoning chair recommends approval of four residential setback variances
Summary
At a recommendation session beginning about 3:35 p.m., the DuPage County zoning chair said written recommendations to approve four residential setback-variation cases have been committed to writing and will be transmitted to the county development committee; no public comment was taken.
The DuPage County zoning chair opened a recommendation session at about 3:35 p.m. and announced there were no public comments. The chair said written recommendations to approve four residential setback-variation cases have been prepared and will be transmitted to the county development committee for final action.
The chair said the Butterfield LLC matter in Winfield Township has a recommendation to approve that is already committed to writing; the chair noted a standard time condition was omitted from the draft and will be added before signing. "I've reviewed a lot of stuff ... and I'm prepared to approve that case," the chair said, adding the recommendation will be amended only to include the missing time condition.
On case 26020, the chair described a D. Rose petition in Milton Township seeking a corner-setback variation to reduce the setback from 30 feet to approximately 17 feet for a single-story house addition. The chair said the petitioner satisfied the requirements and that the board's recommendation to approve has been executed in writing for transmission.
For case 2621 (Proy), the chair said the petitioner made the case for a side-yard setback variation tied to a driveway expansion and that the recommendation to approve has been committed to writing and will be transmitted. The transcript of the session records the numeric change as "from required 1 ft to 8 ft," which appears inconsistent in context; the precise required and proposed setback dimensions were not clarified on the record and are listed in the file as not specified.
In case 2622 (Starub), the chair described a request to reduce a rear-yard setback for a house addition from 25 feet to 10 feet. The chair said they reviewed the matter carefully and recommended approval in writing for transmission to the county development committee.
The chair indicated there was no old business or new business remaining and adjourned the session. No formal roll-call votes or motions with recorded tallies were taken during the recommendation session; the items were documented as written recommendations to be forwarded to the county development committee for final disposition.
