Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: committee approves minutes and three vendor payments; process for master-plan redraft approved
Summary
Committee approved the May 21 minutes (with opposition and one abstention noted), approved two invoices for Antonosi and a $13,000 TPA invoice, and approved a motion to redraft the facilities master plan and proceed with staff and selectmen review. Specific vote tallies were not recorded in the transcript.
Get email alerts on the Committee Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At today’s meeting the Facilities Committee recorded the following formal actions:
- Approval of May 21 minutes: Chair called for a motion; the minutes were moved and seconded. The transcript records one member saying they opposed and another abstaining, but it does not provide a full roll-call tally. The chair proceeded and the motion passed.
- Antonosi invoices: The committee reviewed two Antonosi invoices (March invoice for $4,457.50 and a new invoice for $3,900.50) that together bring paid work to roughly $31,100; members moved and seconded approval of those two invoices and the motion passed. The transcript notes that the invoices were for Memorial Hall and Jeffrey and that work for the chapel had not yet been billed.
- TPA invoice: The committee approved a $13,000 invoice from TPA, bringing TPA’s billed total to $55,250 under contract. Members noted that the final report component of TPA’s work remains outstanding and will cover the balance of the contract.
- Master plan process motion: The committee approved a motion to proceed with redrafting the master plan based on committee and staff input, meet with town staff on June 25, and refer the draft to the board of selectmen for late-summer review.
Notes on vote counts: The transcript records motions, seconds and verbal agreement and also records at least one opposition and one abstention on the minutes vote, but it does not give full yes/no tallies for each motion. The article records outcomes only where the transcript shows the motion was carried or otherwise concluded.
Actions recorded in the transcript should be considered authoritative; specific roll-call vote counts are not provided in the available record.

