Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Investment Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board of Finance returns CIP balances, approves $30,000 for town telephone upgrade
Summary
The Board of Finance approved several CIP fund movements, including returning $51,566.42 and $32,888 to technology master accounts, and authorized a $30,000 supplemental appropriation to complete a telephone system upgrade after bids came in over budget.
Get email alerts on the Capital Investment Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Madison Board of Finance voted to return two leftover capital project balances to the CIP technology master fund and approved a $30,000 supplemental appropriation to close a gap on the town’s telephone upgrade. The board approved returning $51,566.42 from a payroll upgrade project and $32,888 from other CIP balances back into the technology reserve fund, and then authorized the $30,000 draw to finish the telephone conversion.
The action matters because the moves preserve unspent CIP balances in a single technology reserve and clear the way for an ongoing telephone-system contract that came in modestly above the existing project balance. Art Sickle, the town’s technology director, told the board the remaining conversion work produced a roughly $261,000 response to the RFP and that the low bids were about $25,000–$30,000 above the account balance, primarily due to inflation and added scope. “We received a few responses… the two bids that we got were within about $20,000–$25,000 of each other,” Sickle said, explaining why the board was being asked for additional funds.
Board members and staff clarified that returning leftover project balances to the technology master account is a different legal action than transferring funds from one project directly to another. John Rasmus pressed the board on Town Charter 10.6 C’s requirement that certain transfers over $50,000 go to town meeting; staff and members explained that returning remaining balances to a master fund is not the same as a project-to-project transfer that triggers town-meeting approval. Stacy (CIP staff) described the process: funds moved back into the master account will be available for future projects, and any new project withdrawals over $50,000 would require town meeting approval.
The vote to approve the $30,000 supplement was moved by Matt and seconded by Katie; members voted in favor and the motions carried. The board also discussed timing and transparency: members asked that future funding requests show how returned balances, reserve levels, and potential new project requests would affect the planning of upcoming CIP priorities.
The board approved the motions and indicated the technology department will finalize contracts and proceed with the phone conversion. The items were taken during the portion of the meeting addressing items 7–9 on the agenda.

