Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Impact Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Garden City advances Ada County impact-fee ordinance, removes 'corner' fee for next reading
Summary
Council approved a second reading of an ordinance to adopt Ada County development impact fees, agreeing to remove a disputed 'corner' component; staff and an Ada County representative said Boise is still negotiating exceptions for affordable housing and ADUs and the county budgets $300,000 annually to offset approved waivers.
Garden City’s council advanced an ordinance on June 22 that would adopt Ada County development impact fees, voting to take the measure to a third reading after removing a disputed “corner” fee from the schedule.
The council’s second reading, moved and seconded by council members, recorded affirmative votes from Council members Raspersonson, Carver Herbert and Paige, creating a clear record that the ordinance is proceeding without the corner component. City legal staff told the council the ordinance text has been edited to strike the corner fee and that final cleanup will occur before a third reading.
Legal counsel Charlie Watms (city attorney) explained the fee reductions that result from removing the corner charge: for single-family residential builds, the per-unit fee would fall from $750 to about $691; multifamily fees would fall from $519 to $478; retail nonresidential fees would drop from $1,256 to $1,217; industrial and institutional rates were also reduced modestly. Watms said those figures reflect the county’s proposed schedule after removing the corner element.
Ada County representative Steve Rutherford told the council that the county is coordinating with peer cities, including Meridian and Boise, and that Meridian is proceeding without the corner fee. Rutherford said Boise had earlier paused over whether the corner fits a law-enforcement definition but that county staff are continuing discussions and hope to return to the Legislature to clarify statutory language.
Council members pressed Rutherford on contingencies if Boise were to opt out. Rutherford said the county would continue political outreach to persuade council members and mayors to join but that cities are sovereign and the process requires coordination. He also said the county budgets roughly $300,000 annually to underwrite fee waivers for qualifying affordable-housing projects, because state law requires impact-fee funds to remain whole when local waivers are granted.
Several council members raised policy questions about whether the city should write reciprocal waiver language into its ordinance — for example, to match Boise’s potential practice of waiving fees for projects receiving city incentives. Some members expressed reservations about using impact-fee credits to subsidize developer profits, while others said a written mechanism could encourage multi-income or affordable development.
The council asked staff to continue refining the intergovernmental agreement and bring a resolution approving that agreement at the third reading. No final adoption occurred on June 22; the council approved only the second reading as amended.
Next steps: staff will prepare the final ordinance text and an intergovernmental agreement for a third reading and possible adoption, and the council expects to have more clarity after Boise’s pending discussions with county staff.
