Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the High School Schedule topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Stamford leaders pitch semesterized high‑school schedule to boost freshmen on‑track rates
Summary
District leaders presented a proposal to semesterize many high‑school courses so freshmen take four classes in the fall and four in the spring, a change leaders say will reduce student stress, increase opportunities to recover credits and raise the rate of students 'on track' after 9th grade.
Laurie Rose, the district's associate superintendent for high schools, outlined a plan to semesterize a majority of high‑school courses so most freshmen take four classes in the fall and four in the spring rather than eight classes at once. Rose said the change is intended to reduce students' course load, allow earlier interventions for students who are failing and increase the number of credits students can earn each year.
"Students who are on track at the end of 9th grade' which for us would mean earning six credits at the minimum' are four times more likely to graduate high school," Rose said, summarizing research the administration used to justify the proposal.
The administration presented evidence from national studies and local analyses showing higher 9th‑grade "on‑track" rates in 4x4 semesterized models; staff said the district reviewed a meta‑analysis of more than 70 schools and local data on freshman performance. Rose said the semester approach would also preserve pathways for high‑need or accelerated students: some courses (AP, IB, career‑technical classes) would continue on alternating-day AB schedules while most other classes would run in fall or spring blocks.
Superintendent Doctor Lucero and other senior staff told the board the proposed schedule is intended to increase equity and opportunity, not reduce academic standards. The administration emphasized that the proposal has labor and operational implications: scheduling, class sizes, teacher assignments and collective‑bargaining questions must be resolved. Rose said those teacher‑workload issues and contract alignment were discussed with the teachers' association (SCA) during negotiations and that scheduling changes were negotiated into the current contract language in part.
Board members asked about stakeholder outreach; staff said they have held parent town halls, created FAQ materials, produced sample schedules for common student pathways (honors, CTE, AgSci) and will continue family and staff surveys. The administration said it submitted a state charter application in October/November for a small program (Big Picture) to secure sustainable funding for some specialized offerings and expects a state decision in January.
The administration described a phased rollout and pledged follow‑up: surveys of teachers, students and families this fall; analysis of early indicators and scheduled reports back to the board on implementation risks and adjustments.
The board did not take a formal vote on the schedule during the retreat; the presentation closed with an invitation to ask further questions at committee meetings and to continue community engagement.
The next step: staff will continue stakeholder outreach, complete surveys and present recommended implementation details and contract implications at future board committee meetings.
