Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parkinson Field Driveway topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parkinson Field driveway proposal blocked after abutter refuses easement
Summary
The Community Preservation Committee unanimously rejected a $1.398 million plan to build a parking lot and driveway at Parkinson Field after an abutting business refused an easement and safety concerns left the driveway unresolved.
Get email alerts on the Parkinson Field Driveway topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Sudbury Community Preservation Committee on Jan. 14, 2026 voted unanimously to reject a $1,398,000 allocation to construct a parking lot and driveway at Parkinson Field, citing a lack of a safe entrance route after an abutter refused to grant an easement.
Marcia Rasmussen and Public Works staff reported that Ti‑SALES, the site abutter noted in the minutes, refused to grant an easement because of safety concerns related to large trucks. Committee members and consultants (TEC) said the absence of an easement made use of the Ti‑SALES driveway infeasible and left driveway configuration, wetlands, sightlines and buildable width as major unresolved constraints.
Minutes note the town‑owned driveway strip appears as 20 feet on assessor maps, but members cautioned the actual buildable width and site constraints must be verified in the field. Consultants are preparing redesign alternatives that address widening, stormwater management and permitting; test pits for groundwater and stormwater were completed and the results are pending.
Committee members repeatedly described the driveway configuration as the project’s "linchpin," saying that without a safe entrance/exit the scope and feasibility of a parking lot were in doubt. Ms. Roopenian made the motion to recommend the full allocation; Mr. Carty seconded. The roll call vote was No by all nine members, yielding a 0–9 failure.
Next steps include returning to the CPC with alternative driveway solutions, updated stormwater findings and revised cost estimates; until such alternatives are accepted the committee will not forward a construction funding request.
