Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the BfRT Phase3 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sudbury committee delays BFRT acceptance over ADA concerns; reviews Phase 3 design
Summary
The Rail Trails Advisory Committee said outstanding ADA-access and punch-list items at Broadacres Farm have delayed Town acceptance of the Bruce Freeman Rail Trail and reviewed Fuss & O’Neill’s 75% design for BFRT Phase 3, including a proposed Route 20 plaza, culvert replacements, and revised parking and stormwater designs.
The Sudbury Rail Trails Advisory Committee on Nov. 19 heard that unresolved handicapped-access and conservation issues have prevented the Town from formally accepting maintenance responsibility for the Bruce Freeman Rail Trail (BFRT).
Chair John Drobinski told members the town has not scheduled a ribbon-cutting because of remaining punch-list items and questions about the Broadacres Farm plaza and access ramp. Marcia Rasmussen, Planning & Community Development staff, said the town referred a resident’s report on ADA and Architectural Access Board concerns to the Town’s consultant and to MassDOT for review.
Fuss & O’Neill Project Manager Nick Lapointe presented the 75% design progress for BFRT Phase 3 and asked the committee for feedback. The design team proposes a small plaza at the Route 20/Nobscot Road intersection using pervious pavers and reusing granite blocks from culverts to create an elevation change and a protected pause area with a sidewalk connection toward Sudbury Farms. Lapointe said the design aims to balance a visible focal point with driver sight-line safety.
Committee members raised multiple design questions. Christopher Menge and Ken Holtz urged sharing plans with the adjacent landowner (DaVinci’s Restaurant) and cautioned about limiting features close to the roadway. Rasmussen recommended adding a second bench to improve accessibility and asked the design team to analyze how berms, boulders, and wall heights would affect sight lines; Lapointe agreed to review those concerns and consider signage options, including whether a “No right on red” control should be explored.
Lapointe also described changes at the Eaton Road/Framingham entry (revised drainage and grading to meet ADA requirements), and said MassDOT-recommended adjustments to avoid hazardous material removal created steeper grades in places that will require additional guardrail. He told the committee that direct wetland impacts have been eliminated though wetland buffer impacts remain.
On culvert replacements, Lapointe said many locations will require bespoke, site-specific designs to meet the Massachusetts Stream Crossing Standards. At the Nobscot Road parking area, the pavement width has been reduced, a near-final stormwater-basin design is shown, and a wetland replication area is proposed south of the lot. Lapointe said Fuss & O’Neill does not expect to submit the 75% package to MassDOT until January and invited RTAC comments by the first week of December.
Staff also reported recent Phase 2D work: two interpretive whistle-post panels atop granite posts were installed to reflect current conditions, and traffic-signal timing corrections at Hudson and Peakham were conveyed to MassDOT and the contractor. Rasmussen briefed the committee on a Community Preservation Committee question about whether Phase 2D funds could be used for certain projects and said she provided a list of potential projects and applications submitted for connections to the Mass Central Rail Trail (MCRT) and Parkinson Field access improvements.
The committee agreed to continue reviewing the Phase 3 plans and encouraged staff to follow up on ADA ramp questions raised by residents and on additional granite blocks that might be available from prior construction.
