Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the High School Building Project topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Regional School District No. 17 board reviews high school building project, bonding and state space waiver

Regional School District No. 17 Board of Education · June 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a special Oct. 9 meeting, Regional School District No. 17 heard an overview of a proposed high school building project from Interim Superintendent Paul K. Smith, discussed a state-required space waiver and the bonding process (including a referendum), and received an update on architect procurement. No formal votes were taken.

The Regional School District No. 17 Board of Education on Oct. 9 received an overview of a proposed high school building project and discussed the bonding process and a state-required space waiver.

Interim Superintendent Paul K. Smith outlined the project, saying the presentation covered total square footage and identified specific areas that would require a state space waiver; the transcript did not list the square footage or name the specific areas. Matt Ritter of the law firm Shipman and Goodwin described how the space waiver process works and summarized the state requirements tied to that waiver. Ritter also reviewed the steps in the bonding process and noted that a public vote (referendum) will be needed as part of the timeline.

Board members asked questions about the project’s financial impact, its timing and how best to explain the plan to the public; the record reflects concern about the need for strong public communication but does not include substantive cost figures or a detailed schedule. At 6:10 p.m., Matt Ritter left the meeting.

Jack Butkus of Arcadis U.S., Inc. gave a status update on procuring an architect for the project; the transcript records that a procurement effort is underway but does not specify firms under consideration, contract values or a completion date for that procurement.

No motions or formal votes were recorded during the special meeting. The session was called to order by Board Secretary Dr. Kathleen Zandi at 5:30 p.m. and adjourned at 6:28 p.m.

Next steps indicated in the discussion include ongoing planning and procurement work and further development of public outreach materials to explain the project and the referendum process; the transcript does not record an explicit vote or a formal direction to staff to take a specified next step.