Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regional Agreement Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Regional‑agreement amendment process explained by MARS presenter; committee cautioned that current agreement stays in force
Summary
A Massachusetts Association of Regional Schools representative walked the Whittier committee through steps for amending the regional agreement, emphasizing DESE/commissioner review, town votes and that the existing agreement remains legally binding until a new one is approved.
Steve, representing the Massachusetts Association of Regional Schools (MARS), presented a step‑by‑step overview of how a regional agreement is amended under Chapter 71 §14B and DESE review procedures. He outlined recommending steps: review the current agreement, form a region amendment committee (RAC), develop community outreach, ensure compliance with state laws, produce an amended agreement with tracked changes for DESE, secure town or city votes, and obtain final approval from the commissioner before any amended agreement takes effect.
"I need to make clear in this case, you don't open a regional agreement. You amend that agreement," Steve said, underlining that the original agreement remains in force until the amendment is approved and signed by the commissioner. He said the process typically involves DESE legal review and may take up to a year or longer depending on community engagement.
During Q&A, presenters clarified that under the current regional agreement the existing voting rules stay in effect until an amended agreement is approved; however, the amended agreement may change quorum or approval thresholds if towns adopt that language. Steve recommended forming a RAC that includes municipal representatives, school committee members, and community members to draft proposed language and to use tracked changes and a clean copy for DESE submission.
The presentation highlighted specific procedural requirements: compliance with chapter 71 sections required by DESE, the need to document changes in a tracked‑changes Word file and provide a clean copy to the department, and the requirement for towns/cities to take an up‑or‑down vote (cannot alter the text at the town meeting). The presenter also recommended public outreach and possible retention of facilitators and legal counsel for complex amendments.
Committee members asked where other districts had successfully amended agreements; Steve said MARS has assisted multiple districts and can provide a list of examples on request. Several committee members noted that the amendment timeline will affect when the district can move into MSBA schematic design and feasibility phases.
