Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nuisance Abatement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council dismisses two house‑number nuisance charges and directs code update on notices
Summary
After debate over whether homeowners received the full 14‑day compliance window and whether an equipment fee should apply to house‑number postings, Denison City Council dismissed two nuisance charges and asked staff to revise notice language and fee application.
Councilors discussed a pair of nuisance citations related to house numbers and whether the city’s fee schedule and preprinted notices properly reflect code sections for house‑number violations. Council concluded that, in the specific case discussed, the homeowner may not have had a full 14 days to comply and a motion to dismiss charges for the two properties passed by roll call.
During discussion, council members questioned whether the city’s standard $100 equipment fee should apply when staff posts adhesive house numbers rather than using heavy equipment. One councilmember argued that the equipment fee ‘‘doesn’t really apply to this specific ordinance violation’’ and suggested waiving the fee for such cases. Staff explained that the notices are typically posted on the door and that the city is reviewing procedures for properties that appear uninhabited or are investor‑owned.
The mayor and staff noted the city maintains preprinted form notices that include commonly cited code sections and that, when those preprinted forms are exhausted, staff intend to move to a system that will electronically generate tailored notices with the correct code references. Council directed staff to bring a consolidated proposal addressing code language, notice content and fee application back to a future meeting.
The motion to dismiss the charges for the two listed properties (agenda items 10(a) and 10(b)) was approved on a roll call; council then discussed follow‑up steps for notice procedures and code clarifications.
