Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the CDBG topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pearland staff outlines proposed uses for $541,571 in HUD CDBG funds, urges public comment
Summary
City staff and HUD program managers briefed the council and public on the FY2027 CDBG allocation of $541,571 and proposed priorities including mental‑health services, rental assistance, seniors meal delivery, owner‑occupied home‑repair, and reinstating targeted code enforcement in eligible low‑income block groups.
City staff presented an overview to the Pearland City Council on June 22 of the city’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) planning and a proposed spending framework for the coming program year.
Joel Hardy, who led the presentation, told the council the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development will allocate $541,571 to Pearland for HUD program year 2026 (city fiscal year 2027). He reviewed HUD’s regulatory framework (24 CFR 570), described how Pearland qualifies as an entitlement jurisdiction under Formula A and summarized the HUD national objectives that guide eligible expenditures: removal of slum/blight, urgent community needs, and principally benefitting low‑ and moderate‑income residents.
Hardy said Pearland will aim to maximize the social‑services cap (15% of the allocation) for programs the city has prioritized in its five‑year consolidated plan: mental‑health services, rental assistance, and senior meal‑delivery programs. He also proposed continuing the single‑family owner‑occupied home‑repair program and reinstating targeted code‑enforcement efforts that coordinate with the housing‑rehab program in HUD‑eligible block groups. Hardy noted the city currently manages prior‑year balances and active funds of roughly $1.7 million and described the mapping that identifies eligible census block groups under the 42.5% low‑to‑moderate‑income exception the city uses.
Hardy said the public comment period for the action plan runs through July 17 and recommended the council authorize staff to finalize the action plan and submit it to HUD by the August 14 deadline required by HUD (statutory submittal deadline July/August window referenced in the presentation). He emphasized that activities must avoid displacement and that some funding categories (administration, social services) have statutory caps.
Councilmembers asked for clarification about eligible locations (the mapping of eligible block groups), whether code‑enforcement investments would target single‑family or multi‑family properties, and how public notices were being distributed. Hardy recommended continued public outreach during the five‑year consolidated plan process; he also noted the city uses an official newspaper of record for legal notices but will evaluate additional outreach channels to broaden public awareness.
The council took no immediate vote on spending priorities at the hearing; the item was presented as the second required public hearing in the CDBG planning cycle and the council will consider formal action after the public‑comment period closes.
