Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Resilience Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning board appoints liaisons after resilience-plan briefing on sea-level and economy risks

Town of South Thomaston Planning Board · June 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The planning board agreed to appoint two liaisons to a resilience committee after a presentation showing the peninsula-wide plan is roughly two-thirds complete and that the working waterfront comprises the bulk of the local economy. The board voted 5-0 to provide volunteer liaisons and asked staff to arrange follow-up meetings.

Eva Burke, chair of South Thomaston's resilience committee, told the planning board the committee is “about two-thirds of the way through the planning process” and asked for planning-board participation to make the plan actionable.

Why it matters: The committee's vulnerability work — economic, infrastructure, public-health and social assessments — frames choices about shoreline setbacks, culverts, working waterfronts and housing. The Mid Coast Council of Governments's economic assessment cited by the committee found that roughly 80% of the local economy is tied to fishing and marine industries, a point presenters said underlines the economic stakes of sea-level and storm risks.

What the board heard: Michael Elliott, a resilience committee member and longtime planner, described physical exposure in town, saying “40% of the parcels in this town are affected by as little as 3.9 foot elevation,” and urged early coordination between the committee and planning board on land-use questions. Eva Burke outlined the committee's work so far — greenhouse-gas inventory, infrastructure mapping with Knox County GIS and the Island Institute, a public-health vulnerability review, and a social-vulnerability assessment — and asked for one or two planning-board members to meet with the committee to help prioritize feasible actions and prepare funding applications.

Board response and action: Board members expressed general willingness to help but emphasized that policy changes must flow through the select board and the ordinance-review committee when necessary. At the meeting the board nominated Gabe and Catherine as initial liaisons and voted 5-0 to authorize planning-board liaisons to work with the resilience committee. The motion passed unanimously.

Next steps: The resilience committee and the planning-board liaisons will schedule follow-up meetings to review the committee's mapping tools and proposed action items and to identify specific, implementable measures staff and boards can pursue when the plan is finalized.