Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning Bachelor Street topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors urge city to reject bid to rezone 3272 Bachelor Street to heavy industrial
Summary
Residents of Eagan Park told City of East Point planners they strongly oppose BRTU Construction’s request to rezone a vacant lot at 3272 Bachelor Street from I‑1 to I‑2, citing proximity to homes, noise and explosions at nearby recycling facilities, and concerns about inadequate notice.
Residents pressed the City of East Point on June 16, 2026 to deny a rezoning request that would allow a heavy construction contractor lot at 3272 Bachelor Street.
The applicant, represented by Mulugeta (Mulugeta Zeleke), asked to change the site from I‑1 (light industrial) to I‑2 (heavy industrial) and to grant concurrent variances to accommodate heavy-equipment maintenance and storage. The applicant said the property is vacant, fenced when developed, and would add jobs and tax revenue.
Why it matters: Neighbors said the parcel sits very close to homes and already abuts intensive industrial uses. Public commenters described ongoing noise, periodic fires and explosions at nearby SA Recycling, blight on nearby lots and safety worries tied to additional truck traffic and fencing. Justin Anderson, president of the Eagan Park Community Association, told planners, "Approving this kind of request would send a message that industrial expansion matters more than people who live here." Several speakers said they received mailed notices only the day before the meeting and were concerned about short notice.
What residents said: Multiple neighbors said the lot is roughly 100 feet from houses in the neighborhood and that the area already endures frequent industrial impacts. A resident who identified himself as Bill Davis said, "Absolutely do not need more industrial in the area." Commenters asked how the city would protect property values, health and safety if heavier industrial uses were allowed.
Applicant response: Zeleke acknowledged residents' frustration and reiterated his belief that rezoning would improve the site's condition and create employment. He said the change "would not add one single traffic nor add any impact" and urged the city to weigh both preservation and redevelopment opportunities.
Process and next steps: This discussion took place during the city's Community Zoning Information Meeting; the Planning Commission will consider the application at its July review and the City Council will have the final decision later in the cycle. No formal vote was taken at this meeting.
What to watch: Staff will pass neighborhood contact information to the applicant for follow-up meetings. The Planning Commission public session in July will be the opportunity for additional testimony and for staff to present technical analysis.
