Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Green Meadow Elementary Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Maynard committee hears MSBA Green Meadow design, early-site work and savings
Summary
Design team told the Maynard School Committee that Green Meadow Elementary remains on track for a 60% MSBA construction-document submission at month-end, described a playground relocation for safety and adjacency, noted early-site enabling bids returned roughly $700,000 under estimate, and explained geothermal-well siting to capture schedule and cost efficiencies.
The Maynard School Committee received a detailed progress update on the Green Meadow Elementary School project and next steps from the project team.
The presenter said the project is maintaining the approved educational program and that a 60% construction document submission to the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) is planned at the end of the month. "We are currently working towards a document submission to MSBA coming up at the end of the month that will be our 60% construction document submission," the presenter told the committee. The team reported only minimal design changes since schematic design.
On site layout, the presenter described moving the kindergarten–third-grade play area to the front of the building to shorten the walk to the school’s cafeteria, gym and health suite and to improve visibility for safety and for parents dropping off younger children. The team said the change did not increase project cost and maintained roughly the same number of parking spaces (about 125).
Committee members pressed on subsurface issues and field construction. The presenter said all existing building foundations and debris will be removed and that appropriate soils will be brought in and graded; he added that MSBA does not reimburse for formal athletic fields, so illustrations of elementary playfields on plans are placeholders for future town actions.
The project team also described early-site enabling work that has been bid. The enabling package — which prepares the site (access road, demolition staging, ledge removal, geothermal well installation and related preliminary work) — was reported to have come in roughly $700,000 under the engineer’s estimate, a savings the presenter said will help condense the schedule and reduce subsequent bid costs.
On sustainability, the team explained a decision to move geothermal wells onto a nearby town-owned parcel managed by DPW so the wells could be installed before demolition; that sequencing avoids temporary heating systems during the first winter and was estimated to save about $120,000. The presenter noted some tree removal will be required for the relocated wells, and that the wells will be drilled to depth and the area loamed and hydroseeded afterward.
Security planning has been ongoing: police and fire chiefs and a security consultant have participated in meetings, and the team recommended a future executive-session review to discuss detailed security measures.
The presenter said routine design work — detailing, labeling and furniture layouts — is being completed and that the town and district will continue outreach on traffic patterns and opening-week procedures to ensure a smooth start when the new building opens.
Next steps: the team will submit the 60% documents to MSBA, continue early-site enabling work through late summer and advance procurement so building work can begin in early 2025.
