Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities Benchmarking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants tell UMS trustees FY25 facilities report shows aging portfolio, $1.9 billion reinvestment need
Summary
Gordian told the University of Maine System's FFT committee that 71% of system square footage is over 25 years old and the system faces about $1.9 billion in reinvestment need; trustees asked for campus breakouts, ALON/private funding details and follow‑up master planning work.
Gordian consultants presented the FY25 facilities benchmarking to the University of Maine System Board of Trustees’ Finance, Facilities and Technology Committee on June 30, laying out building‑age, enrollment and reinvestment metrics intended to guide capital planning.
The consultant, Victoria Vile of Gordian, told trustees the system’s total enrollment is down about 7% since fiscal year 2018 while in‑person student FTE has fallen roughly 37% over the same period. Those shifts in teaching modality, she said, are driving questions about building use and opportunities to convert, lease or divest space.
Gordian’s analysis breaks the system’s portfolio by construction vintage and by the effect of renovations. The consultants reported the system’s weighted construction age is about 56 years; renovations have reduced the effective age to about 49 years systemwide. They said 51% of the system’s space was constructed during the post‑war/modern era and that cohort accounts for many of the system’s highest resource drains.
On capital finance, Gordian identified an annual investment target of roughly $60.5 million for the system to prevent growth of deferred maintenance. The consultants said FY25 spending reached about 90% of the target — the closest the system has been to the recommended target since 2013 — but projected capital plans for 2026–2031 still fall short in Gordian’s baseline projections.
Most notably, Gordian estimated the system’s reinvestment (backlog) need at just under $1.9 billion, which the presenters normalized to approximately $29 per gross square foot. Gordian contrasted that with peer averages reported in its database (roughly $145–$152 per gross square foot), noting peers have generally invested more aggressively in existing‑space renewals. The consultants recommended prioritizing high‑return work on building envelopes and core mechanical systems and considering divestment of high‑need, low‑value space.
Trustees asked detailed follow‑ups. Trustee Alexander asked how Gordian defines the peer group; Victoria Vile said the comparison is to Gordian’s public higher‑education database and that the set includes institutions of various sizes and types but is normalized on a per‑gross‑square‑foot basis. The chancellor and the board asked staff to provide an ALON/private‑funds breakout so trustees can see how federally matched ALON dollars and campus or private matching funds were counted in recent capital projects. Gordian and system staff agreed to provide campus‑level NAV lists, funding‑source breakouts and appendix slides requested by trustees. System staff also said they will share master‑planning schedules (Goody Clancy was named as the firm recently awarded an RFP for campus master planning) and other follow‑up materials.
Gordian also pointed to an operational challenge: when adjusted for inflation, operating dollars for facilities are lower in FY25 than in FY16, which reduces the system’s day‑to‑day ability to maintain buildings. The consultants flagged staffing pressures in facilities trades and projected retirements that will affect operations through 2030.
What’s next: Gordian and University of Maine System staff agreed to return detailed campus breakouts, an ALON/private funds accounting, and additional appendix slides so trustees can use the FY25 analysis to inform near‑term capital prioritization and the system’s master planning process.
