Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Masking Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bourne School Committee approves local mask policy after public objections; vote 5–2
Summary
After public commenters urged parental choice and raised development/health concerns, the Bourne School Committee voted 5–2 on Aug. 25 to adopt Policy EBCFA, aligning local practice with state guidance that mandates masks in Massachusetts public schools through Oct. 1 unless a school reaches an 80% vaccination threshold.
Get email alerts on the Masking Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Bourne School Committee on Aug. 25 adopted a local masking policy, EBCFA, by a 5–2 roll‑call vote after hearing multiple public comments opposing mask requirements and a detailed presentation from the superintendent on state guidance and district protocols.
Superintendent Dr. Kerri Anne Quinlan‑Zhou told the committee that district plans were developed with the administration team and local medical advisors and mirror Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education guidance. She said the commissioner’s memo requires masks for all public schools in Massachusetts effective immediately and at least until Oct. 1, 2021, and that a school would need to show an 80% vaccination rate to lift the mandate after that date. Dr. Zhou also reviewed three testing methods the district will use (parental consent required), air‑quality measures and a recommendation of three feet spacing at lunch.
Public commenters urged the committee to allow parental choice. Bourne resident Vanessa Williams, a parent of a preschooler with disabilities, said she has seen verbal progress in her child and worried masks could interfere with phonics and speech development; Chair Emily Berry asked Williams to follow up with the superintendent. Shawna Shanahan called the mandate "tyrannical, unethical, unlawful" and asked whether the district would assume liability for harms caused by masks, saying, "you can not force him to wear a mask." Other speakers including Mary Marquebreuck and Meredith Dinon expressed concerns that masks are experimental or are prompting families to homeschool.
Committee members pressed administrators for operational details. Dr. Ryan Place said quarantine rules come from the state and read DESE guidance saying quarantine is 10 days; he added that someone who tested positive within the prior 90 days would not be treated as a close contact for testing/quarantine purposes. Members asked whether the proposed local policy would govern after the state mandate lifts and whether the 80% threshold could be adjusted to account for younger grades not yet eligible for vaccination; Dr. Zhou said the commissioner would make binding decisions about state guidance and she would seek clarification where needed.
Positions among committee members were split. Steven Strojny said he would vote no and asked administrators to avoid punitive discipline for students who resist masking; Kari MacRae also said she planned to vote no. Paul McMaster described the stakes in personal terms, saying he had lost his parents to COVID within the previous months and supporting the mitigation measures; Erin Perry said she would vote yes if mask wearing would keep her young child in in‑person school.
Erin Perry moved to approve Policy EBCFA; Paul McMaster seconded. The motion passed by roll call, 5–2–0. The committee then noted future agenda items and adjourned 7–0–0 at 8:30 p.m.
The policy text reviewed at the meeting and the DESE implementation memo were listed among the meeting exhibits; several operational details flagged during Q&A — including precise criteria for lifting masking based on age groups and how pool testing would be implemented — were left for administrators to clarify at a future meeting.
