Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Format topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mass. Commission for the Blind weighs occasional in‑person meetings, members urge hybrid option
Summary
Board members discussed holding occasional in‑person meetings at the commission’s offices while preserving virtual access. Members and public commenters raised scheduling, transportation and accessibility concerns and recommended any in‑person event be hybrid or specially focused.
Get email alerts on the Meeting Format topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Massachusetts Commission for the Blind discussed whether to hold occasional in‑person board meetings while preserving the remote participation that many members and consumers rely on.
A board member proposed meeting at the commission’s offices in the coming months to let board members and the public meet staff in person. “I think sometimes an in‑person meeting is valuable for a lot of intangible reasons,” the board member said, adding any such meeting need not replace regular virtual sessions.
Board members raised practical concerns. Kathy said holding meetings during the workday would require her to take time off from a full‑time job, and Nancy flagged transportation costs the commission might need to cover. Blair said she scheduled teaching around virtual meetings and that frequent in‑person sessions would be hard to attend. Members recommended planning well in advance and making any in‑person meeting a special event—such as a presentation or strategic planning session—rather than a routine replacement for virtual meetings.
Members also noted the legal context: the chair recited that remote meetings are being held under laws enacted in July 2022 and that Governor Healey’s extension of those authorities runs through March 31, 2025. Several participants said the commission should make these operational points part of any request to extend remote meeting authorization.
Public commenters told the board that while Zoom enables broader attendance, occasional in‑person gatherings have distinct value. “As a member of the public that would serve me,” one commenter said, noting in‑person contact can enhance community connections. Jerry Barrier urged that any in‑person meeting be offered as a hybrid so those who cannot or choose not to travel can remain connected virtually.
The board accepted the minutes from the Nov. 5 meeting at the start of the session; no further votes on meeting format were taken.

