Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves bus-contract transfer and 3.9% food‑service CPI after debate over vendor oversight
Summary
The committee approved transferring local bus contracts to Student Transportation of America and approved a CPI increase in the Witson's food‑service contract, while members placed a hold on one Meeting Street special‑education contract pending tuition clarifications and pressed the administration to resolve supervision and liability issues with the food‑service vendor.
Get email alerts on the Procurement Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Fall River School Committee on June 23 approved an emergency transfer of existing bus contracts from Tremblay's (Tremble's) Bus Company to Student Transportation of America and moved through several contract amendments for special‑education placements, while holding one Meeting Street (Rhode Island) contract for clarification of a tuition calculation.
Chief Operating Officer Ken Pachico presented the bus‑contract transfer as an emergency item and the committee approved it by roll call. The committee also approved miscellaneous contracts (E+ Technology, Tivetan Public Schools) and several special‑education amendments (Justice Resource Institute, Reeds Collaborative, Pilgrim Area Collaborative, New Direction Solutions). Committee members placed a hold on a Meeting Street contract after a member identified a discrepancy in the tuition calculation and asked the business office to provide supporting documentation prior to finalization.
The meeting’s most contentious discussion concerned a one‑year renewal/extension of the district’s food‑service contract with Witson's (a renewal step in a five‑year contract) that included a 3.9% CPI escalator. Several members expressed dissatisfaction with the vendor’s structure in the district — specifically that an on‑site supervisor provided through the vendor appeared to exercise supervisory roles over district staff. Committee member Mr. Das urged the administration to “rectify the situation” by amending the contract or formalizing dual employment or an appointment agreement so that the district’s liability and supervisory lines are clear.
After debate and a series of amendments directing the superintendent to address vendor oversight and to pursue a competitive bid process when the contract expires, the committee voted to approve the 3.9% CPI increase required by the contract’s escalation language. Members also directed administration to prepare for an out‑to‑bid process next summer so the committee has options before the final renewal year.
The committee asked administration to provide clearer contract documentation and earlier notice on renewal deadlines in future cycles so members have time to evaluate bidding options.

