Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Forecasting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oklahoma County BET trims future-forecast tracker, removes multiple funded items
Summary
The Budget Evaluation Team voted to remove several funded items from the future-forecast tracker — including the new detention center phase one — and cleared several ARPA- and capital-funded projects from the list so the tracker focuses on unfunded future needs.
The Oklahoma County Budget Evaluation Team voted during its June meeting to remove multiple funded projects from the county’s future-forecast tracker, narrowing that list to items the board sees as unfunded future considerations.
Members debated whether funded items should remain on the tracker or move to a separate “funded” tab. After discussion, the board approved motions to remove the new detention center construction phase one from the tracker and to clear several ARPA-funded lines and other funded projects from the future-forecast list. The motion to remove the detention center phase one passed on a recorded tally of five in favor and three opposed; other removals carried on voice votes.
Supporters of removal said the tracker should focus on unfunded projects so the board and its representatives can prioritize limited general-fund resources; those opposing removal cautioned that some funded projects still face potential additional costs and should remain visible. "If it's funded and the funding source is clear, it doesn't need to be on the future forecast," one committee member said during debate.
The board also clarified that the BET watch list — a short-term list of items potentially requiring budget transfers in the coming fiscal year — will remain distinct from the longer-range future-forecast tracker. Members directed staff to refine how reserve balances and one-time versus ongoing amounts are displayed, and to return with a clearer fund-balance breakdown at the July meeting and, if needed, more detail at the September supplement.
The actions reduce duplication between the tracker and the capital-projects list and aim to make it easier for elected officials and staff to see which items may require budget-board recommendations for additional general-fund dollars in the near term. The meeting adjourned after citizens participation drew no speakers.
The board’s changes take effect immediately for the tracker; items removed can be added back later if circumstances or funding sources change.
