Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Franklin officials review 10-year Transit Master Plan that recommends microtransit pilots and phased service upgrades
Summary
Consultants presented a 10-year Transit Master Plan that recommends near-term technology and outreach work, a Cool Springs microtransit pilot, a permanent downtown shuttle and phased fixed-route changes; implementation will be data-driven and later-year operations will require new funding and grant-seeking.
A consultant presented the City of Franklin’s proposed 2026 Transit Master Plan and urged the Board of Mayor and Aldermen to consider adopting a phased, data-driven vision for local transit improvements.
Joel Ray, director of Transit Services with Benesch, told the board the plan’s purpose was “to create this vision for Franklin Transit, set goals and structures in place to help evolve the system over the next decade.” He summarized more than 50 recommendations grouped under outreach and communication, planning and policy, technology assessments, performance monitoring and service improvements.
The plan identifies near-term changes including a Cool Springs microtransit pilot, a permanent downtown shuttle connecting the Factory and downtown, and technology upgrades such as mobile fare payments and improved on-board passenger counting. Ray said the plan is phased so earlier data and technology improvements will guide whether later services, including a possible airport shuttle, are implemented.
Board members pressed for details on routing and coverage. Alderman Peterson asked whether the conceptual network would serve Jim Warren Park and Bicentennial Park; Ray said routes are conceptual and that microtransit zones are designed to complement fixed routes so riders could use microtransit for first/last-mile trips and fixed routes for higher-demand corridors.
Vice Mayor Baggett said the plan provides a framework for seeking federal and state funds and for setting a local subsidy level if the board chooses to expand operations. Ray acknowledged most capital and planning recommendations are funded at planning-level estimates but warned that later-year operational expansion (notably after 2030) will require new revenue sources.
Staff said the plan will go before the Planning Commission this week and that adoption would appear on the board’s agenda for a future meeting; the consultant and staff recommended continued outreach to riders and stakeholders during implementation.
The work session discussion did not include a formal vote; adoption was listed for future commission and board consideration.
