Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facility Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board conditionally approves Royalty Roofing quote for police station roof pending review
Summary
The board agreed to proceed with Royalty Roofing for police station roof work, contingent on staff (Dwayne) reviewing quote details to confirm product and cost differences; board members noted a wide discrepancy between quoted repair and replacement estimates.
Board members discussed multiple quotes for roof work at the police station and moved to approve the proposal from Royalty Roofing subject to a staff review of the bid details.
Dwayne said he would review the quotes and follow up; the meeting record included three options: a repair/patch estimate (noted roughly as $42,000 and described as a non-warranty repair), a full replacement quoted in one estimate near $78,000, and a Royalty Roofing full-replacement quote reported in the record at approximately $45,000–$46,000. Board members expressed concern about the substantial discrepancy between the quotes and asked staff to verify whether different materials or warranties explained the price gap. Lucas and others said Royalty had provided satisfactory service on a recent wellness-center roof job and that Royalty responded quickly to service calls.
The board approved a motion to proceed with Royalty Roofing on the condition that Dwayne review the documentation and advise the board if there are material discrepancies requiring reconsideration. The board did not record a roll-call vote in the transcript; the motion passed by voice.
Staff noted funding for the work had not been fully identified at the meeting but that the city could reallocate within the year; the board discussed possible departmental chargebacks for the water office portion if applicable.
