Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff outlines six‑zone Opportunity Zone 2.0 submission and tight schedule
Summary
Planning staff briefed the commission on Opportunity Zone 2.0, proposing six census‑tract nominations that prioritize existing OZ 1.0 areas and industrial parcels; staff said council review is planned for July 7 and applications must be submitted by July 23.
Planning staff briefed the Historical Advisory Commission on June 25 about the city’s proposed submission for Opportunity Zone 2.0, an updated federal designation program that is competitive at the governor’s screening stage.
Planning staff explained that OZ 2.0 allows investors who hold qualified investments for five years or more to receive capital gains tax benefits. Staff said the governor will nominate roughly 25% of eligible census tracts statewide to the federal government, making the process competitive. To improve the city’s score, staff said they will emphasize shovel‑ready sites, job‑first projects, demonstrated city or public investment, and planned or existing multifamily development where appropriate.
Staff proposed six census tracts for Oroville’s submission, prioritizing tracts already in OZ 1.0 and several industrial and downtown parcels the city considers important for future development. The presentation identified tract numbers and mapped potential annexation areas and a large warehouse project location; staff noted that some parcels cross jurisdictional boundaries and that county coordination is underway.
Planning staff said the planning commission will not make a formal recommendation on this informational item; the city council is scheduled to consider the submission on July 7 and the application package is due to the governor’s office by July 23. Staff cautioned that Opportunity Zone status under OZ 1.0 remains effective through Dec. 31, 2028, even if the OZ 2.0 submission is not selected.
Commissioners asked about competitiveness and the city’s use of lobbyists; staff acknowledged coordination with county leaders and that state and federal lobbyists have been engaged to support the city’s case.
Provenance: topicintro SEG 109; topfinish SEG 203.
Speakers quoted or referenced in this article: planning staff (presenter, cited as Wes in the meeting record).
