Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Weapons Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Subcommittee favors broader weapons policy language after staff example of student injury
Summary
After staff described a past incident in which a small implement caused serious injury, the subcommittee favored adopting lengthier model language for the weapons and dangerous-instruments policy to capture use, threatened use and attempted use.
The subcommittee reviewed the district's weapons and dangerous-instruments policy and signaled support for adopting a lengthier alternative from the model policy that covers items used or threatened to be used as weapons.
The chair described a past incident in which a student hurled a short PVC tube and caused serious injury requiring treatment; she said the proposed language clarifies that how an item is used, attempted to be used, or threatened to be used — not only its nominal description — determines whether it qualifies as a dangerous instrument.
"How it is used ... can cause serious harm or death," the chair said, arguing that clearer language helps administrators make consistent decisions and protect students.
Committee members agreed that the model language from the CAB version provides needed coverage. The chair indicated she would request the board delete the older policy reference (513.1.2) and adopt the recommended replacement (513.1.7) if the committee concurs.
The committee did not record a formal roll-call vote in the transcript but reached internal agreement to advance the language for further consideration by the full board.
