Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developer previews 84 affordable senior units and new retail at 410 Great Road
Summary
Poly Companies previewed a large mixed‑use project that would include roughly 84 deeply affordable senior housing units, a relocated historic tunnel house and new retail (including a proposed anchor tenant and possible bank drive‑thru). Board members pressed design, parking and loading concerns and asked for a clearer schedule.
At a June 25 session of the Littleton Planning Board, Morgan Pearson of Poly Companies provided a project preview for a multi‑phase mixed‑use development that would include affordable senior housing at 410 Great Road, relocated historic elements and new retail space.
Pearson said the immediate submission the developer plans to file would seek approvals for about 84 deeply affordable senior housing units and associated site amenities, and he described a proposed retail component that the team said may include an "anchor" tenant and a smaller retail building. "We plan to submit for approximately 84 deeply affordable and senior housing units," Pearson told the board, and he said the Historical Commission had voted unanimously to support relocating the tunnel house within the project area to preserve and reuse the structure.
Why it matters: The proposal would add sizable affordable senior housing capacity and accompanying retail to a large development parcel that will help shape circulation and the town's village center. Board members emphasized that some proposed retail uses, such as a bank with a drive‑thru, may not fit cleanly within the town's form‑based code and urged the team to reconcile tenant needs with Littleton's street‑facing design standards.
Board feedback focused on siting and design. Members suggested moving retail buildings closer to the interior street and putting parking behind the buildings to create a more walkable, street‑facing edge. Concerns about truck circulation and loading areas were raised; one board member asked whether delivery trucks could safely turn at the proposed loading configuration. The developer responded that prospective tenants often require specific layouts and parking ratios and that the team is trying to balance tenant requirements with town design goals.
Pearson also previewed a larger second phase (parcel "500") where the team is targeting between 140 and 175 additional housing units, a range driven by parking requirements and construction costs, and emphasized the need to coordinate tenant selection to achieve critical mass for retail success.
Next steps and outreach: The developer said formal submission materials will be filed ahead of the board's July 9 meeting and committed to provide a public "landing page" and updated signs to keep the community informed about timing, construction milestones and the tunnel house relocation. Board members asked for a clearer master schedule with permitting and construction milestones to be presented at the next meeting.
Quotes: "We plan to submit for approximately 84 deeply affordable and senior housing units at 410 Great Road," Morgan Pearson said. On retail design, a board member said the plan risked looking like "a circuit city in a mall parking lot" and urged the team to pull buildings up to the street and soften facades. "We'll show you more views to give you a better feel," the developer responded.
What to watch: Look for the formal submission materials, the project's permitting schedule, and how the team resolves drive‑thru/drive‑in retail requests with Littleton's form‑based code and street‑facing design goals.
