Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Repeal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Policy committee to send two 2011 student-conduct policies to full board after legal review
Summary
On Oct. 20, Ridgefield School District’s policy committee recommended that two 2011-era student conduct policies (5131 and 5131.21) be repealed as duplicative of the district’s newer school-climate policy and will bring them to the full board for first read on Oct. 27, after legal cross-checks and communications planning.
Get email alerts on the Policy Repeal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Ridgefield School District policy committee voted Oct. 20 to send two older student-conduct policies to the full Board of Education for a first reading, following advice from legal counsel that the rules are largely duplicative of the district’s newer school-climate policy.
Miss Moore opened the committee meeting by noting that Policy 5131 (conduct and discipline) and Policy 5131.21 (threats or acts of violence), both adopted in 2011, are on the agenda. Shipman & Goodwin, the district’s legal counsel, advised that the policies are not legally required and recommended repeal, Miss Moore said.
“It's not legally necessary,” Superintendent Dr. Susie Dilva said of the older policies, adding that the district now has a school-climate policy adopted more recently that covers the same ground. “I think it makes good sense that it um be repealed.”
Why it matters: board members raised two practical concerns. First, other policies or school handbooks may still reference the older policy numbers, which could create cross-reference problems if the board removes the top-level policy without updating those materials. Second, some board members said the community needs clear communication so families do not interpret repeal as a reduction in safety practices.
Administration described how those concerns will be handled. Staff said they will ask legal counsel to verify whether any handbooks or other policies formally reference 5131 or 5131.21 and will scrub cross-references before bringing repeal language to the board. The district is preparing an FAQ and updates to its RPS safety and security website to explain current practice, including how threat assessments are handled.
Operational details provided during the meeting: staff described the district’s threat-assessment process (identified in the discussion as the SEASTAG model), differentiated it from suicide/risk-assessment processes, and explained that reporting is an immediate report to building administration who convene a crisis team when necessary. Mental-health staff, school resource officers and outside agencies are engaged as appropriate, and interim safety plans are put in place while investigations proceed, officials said.
Next steps: The committee agreed to place Policy 5131 and Policy 5131.21 on the full board’s Oct. 27 agenda for a first read, after legal cross-checks and with communication materials for families. The committee also tabled Policy 5131.11 (electronic/video surveillance) until November while awaiting legal guidance.

