Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Monroe School District flags rising special-education outplacement and transport costs as state reimbursements stay uncertain
Summary
District presenters told the school board that special-education outplacements, lengthy student transports and complex needs are driving higher costs; the district projects $1.34 million in excess-cost reimbursement but said supplemental state funding timing and amount remain uncertain.
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marissa, a special-education presenter for the Monroe School District, told the board the district is tracking 324 identified special-education students districtwide (reported as 46% of the identified population) and that 35 students—about 5% of those identified—are currently outplaced, primarily for therapeutic social-emotional and behavioral programs.
She said the district is seeing both higher tuition and transportation expenses for outplaced students and emphasized that the key driver of cost is the complexity of students’ needs rather than simple head counts. "It's important to remember that it's not the amount of students moving in ... it's really the complexity of their needs and the programming and staffing that they need," Marissa said.
The district presented a worked example of the state excess-cost formula. Using the state per-pupil expenditure cited in the presentation ($18,863) multiplied by the 4.5 factor, the threshold was described as $84,884. For one outplaced-student example the combined tuition and transportation cost was given as $154,977; after applying the district's budgeted 65% state reimbursement the district's net obligation for that student was shown as roughly $109,417. Presenters stressed that the district's budgeted reimbursement percentage is an estimate: the transcript notes historical fluctuation and supplemental state payments that changed the effective reimbursement in prior years.
The district reported it expects at least $1,340,000 in excess-cost reimbursement under current calculations (reported at 63%). Presenters cautioned that prior-year supplemental payments from the state changed the final amounts and that the timing and size of any additional state support is uncertain. A board member observed, "There's a lot of lobbying going on," when asked about prospects for supplemental funding.
Transportation was highlighted as a major pressure point. Presenters said the district contracts with AllStar and two private companies, pays for additional aides or monitors when required, and currently transports roughly 40 special-education students for outplacements and other needs; some students travel 45–50 minutes each way. The presentation estimated a $197,000 increase in the systemwide transportation line for next year and a smaller roughly $7,100 increase on the preschool transportation line.
Presenters also described projected changes in tuition lines: a modest $6,800 decrease in public tuition was attributed to some students graduating, while private tuition projections showed a $233,000 decrease because several students graduated and three are being returned to in-district services. Summer tuition projections were reported to increase—public summer +$20,000 and private summer +$45,000—because providers recommended summer programs to prevent regression for students attending outplacements.
District staff proposed a targeted staffing increase to meet demand: adding 0.3 full-time-equivalent speech-language pathologist at Fawn Hollow Elementary (increasing site coverage from 1.5 to 1.8 FTE) and noted one full-time speech-language pathology assistant at Fawn Hollow and five assistants districtwide.
The presentation closed by placing the special-education pressures in context of the whole budget: the district presenter reported the net FY26 budget increase attributable to discussed changes as $67,862 (reported as 1.21% of the budget) and asked the board and community to support the budget request. The board recessed to hear the next presentation on curriculum.

