Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Admissions Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board raises concerns after Department of Education presentation flags 'opportunity gap' in vocational admissions
Summary
At its Nov. 19 meeting the Northampton-Smith Vocational Agricultural Board heard a superintendent report contesting Department of Education data that the board says misrepresented applicant pools and acceptance rates; trustees agreed to seek more granular applicant-level data before considering policy changes.
At the Nov. 19 meeting of the Board of Trustees of Northampton-Smith Vocational Agricultural High School, the superintendent challenged a Department of Education presentation that he said mischaracterized admissions patterns at vocational schools and could lead to statewide policy changes.
The superintendent told trustees that the state slides compared eligible populations to enrolled students in ways that were "skewed" and misleading. He presented school-level numbers from Northampton that, he said, show a different picture: among eligible eighth graders in Northampton, 27% were students of color and 73% were white; of those students of color, 35% applied to Smith vocational and 48% of those applicants were offered admission, while 18% of white students applied and 78% of white applicants were offered admission. He described similar patterns for low-income students and students with disabilities and raised particular concern about English-learner data that the state slide presented as "0% accepted" without clarifying that only one EL student from the local eligible pool had applied.
"The Department of Ed is skewing data," the superintendent said, arguing the state presentation did not show applicant pools and had conflated Northampton-only figures with data that included nonresident sending districts. He urged the board to request the underlying applicant-level data from the department so schools can analyze whether particular admissions criteria (grades, discipline, attendance, staff recommendations) disproportionately exclude subgroups.
Trustees discussed possible statewide responses the Board of Education might consider, including lotteries or modifications to selective criteria, but no board-level policy change was adopted at the meeting. Trustees emphasized the need to distinguish between federal accountability comparisons (eligible vs. enrolled) and the state's newly emphasized "opportunity gap" metric, and said they will pursue follow-up: asking DESE for the disaggregated admissions data used in the study and coordinating with other vocational administrators to analyze causes and possible fixes.
Next steps: the board will request the data used by the Department of Education and discuss further at a future meeting; no changes to local admissions policy were enacted Nov. 19.
