Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assessment review: district cites improved attendance and AP pass rates, flags middle‑level math and high‑needs gaps
Summary
District staff presented the annual assessment review showing declines in chronic absenteeism, strong AP pass rates (93% scoring 3+ among test takers), and notable growth in several schools; they also highlighted rising share of 'high‑needs' students (about 18.6% to 29% over a decade) and targeted areas for improvement such as middle‑school math and writing.
District leaders used the Nov. 5 meeting to review assessment and accountability data for 2023–24, reporting mixed results: measurable progress in growth and attendance alongside persistent achievement gaps for some student groups.
Presenters said chronic absenteeism has decreased and that the district met or exceeded growth expectations in multiple grades. Heather (assessment staff) framed the presentation with a “state of the union” takeaway: overall student achievement is strong but the district must close gaps for high‑needs subgroups and increase relevancy of learning for students.
The district highlighted Advanced Placement outcomes: 149 students took at least one AP exam in 2023–24; 93% of those students scored a 3 or higher on at least one exam, and 139 individual exam scores were 5s, which staff called “impressive.” Essex Elementary was named a 2024 School of Recognition after significant improvement in growth and targets.
Staff also noted a long‑term rise in the district’s high‑needs population—from about 18.6% to roughly 29% over 10 years—and said that trend affects planning for interventions and services. Targeted short‑term actions include department data reviews, curriculum reviews (math and science on a multi‑year cycle), expanded academic coaching, and a Desi high‑dosage tutoring grant focused on specific grade levels.
Committee members asked for further disaggregation by school and subgroup and suggested measures beyond standardized tests—such as senior exit surveys and student portfolios—to capture a broader picture of readiness. Staff agreed to provide additional breakdowns and to continue using a mix of local and state measures to guide interventions.
