Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater Retention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carter Lake council presses for stronger enforcement of stormwater retention ponds
Summary
Council members and planning board leaders pressed for tougher rules and enforcement for above-ground retention ponds, saying many are poorly maintained and pose safety and nuisance risks; staff warned that state SUDAS standards limit mandatory upgrades unless the city offsets extra costs, and council set a workshop to draft enforcement language.
The Carter Lake City Council spent the bulk of the meeting debating how to deal with aging and poorly maintained stormwater retention ponds, with planning board members urging the city to tighten rules and enforcement.
Planning board member Ray told the council several above-ground ponds in town “need attention” and said he would like the council to require new ponds to be placed underground. “They’re an eyesore, [a] mosquito pit,” Ray said, adding the ponds could present drowning risks for children. Ray specifically flagged a city-owned pond behind the trailer court adjacent to the walking path and said private ponds around town have “continuously gotten worse.”
Why it matters: the council’s discussion touches on public-safety, neighborhood blight and long-term stormwater management. For neighborhoods and prospective developers, changes to local rules could mean higher upfront costs or a requirement to alter pond designs.
City staff and engineering advisers warned councilmembers that state SUDAS (state design standards referenced in the meeting) limit what a city may require without paying the incremental cost of improvements above the state minimum. A staff member explained that if the city mandates standards that exceed SUDAS, the city may be required to cover the difference for developers or require cost-sharing mechanisms. Council members pressed staff for practical enforcement tools that do not require immediate large expenditures by the city.
Options discussed included annual engineer inspections with required corrective actions, deadlines for compliance (for example 60 days or a longer seasonal window), and a process for the city to perform work and place a lien or special assessment on a property that fails to comply. Council members also discussed using nuisance authority—targeting stagnation, trash, excess vegetation or other hazards—to compel clean-up without changing design standards.
Council and staff agreed the issue needs more drafting and a public review period. Several council members asked staff to put proposed language into ordinance form and to prepare a standard notice letter that can be tailored to each pond. Staff estimated Carter Lake currently has roughly 10–15 private retention features in addition to city-owned examples; one council member recalled the senior-living project that required an upgraded, shallower pond design and said the cost to go fully underground had been “a half a million dollars” in that instance.
Next steps: council asked staff and the stormwater committee to produce written ordinance language and enforcement options and scheduled a workshop to review proposed code changes and compliance procedures.
All quotes and paraphrases are taken from remarks recorded during the Carter Lake City Council meeting.
