Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

New London board approves consent items and several policies, tables married/pregnant policy for review

New London Board of Education · July 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved consent items including a $335,524 SY24 budget revision and first readings of several policies, amended wording on student handbooks, and voted to table Policy 5134 (Married/Pregnant Students) pending Policy Committee review.

The New London Board of Education approved the consent agenda and several policy items at its April 29 meeting.

A motion by President Maynard-Adams (seconded by Danni Cruz) approved the consent agenda, including a budget revision adding $335,524 to the SY24 budget and first readings of Policy 5131.111 (Video Surveillance) and Policy 5141.22 (Communicable/Infectious Diseases). The consent agenda motion carried, 7-0.

Separately, the board approved Policy 6141.31 (Bilingual-English Language Learning Education) for its first reading on a motion by Bryan Doughty, seconded by Ms. Maynard-Adams; Assistant Superintendent Dr. Hills-Papetti told members the policy’s 30-month limit is written in the legislation. That motion carried, 7-0.

On Policy 5114.12 (Student Handbooks), the board approved a motion to adopt the policy with an amendment changing the phrase “The administration” to “Each school administration” to clarify handbook authorship; vote as amended carried 7-0.

On Policy 5134 (Married/Pregnant Students), board members expressed discomfort pairing “married” and “pregnant” in one policy and moved to table it and refer it back to the Policy Committee for revision; that motion carried 7-0.

These votes advance multiple policies to subsequent steps in the district policy process; where the record shows only a first reading, the board did not adopt final policy language at this meeting.