Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

New London board rejects publishing detailed FY25 salary schedule to City Council

New London Board of Education · July 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A motion to provide a detailed FY25 salary schedule to City Council failed 0-7 after board members cited workload, confidentiality and timing concerns; the board suggested future joint review through a task force rather than immediate disclosure.

The New London Board of Education voted unanimously against a motion to add a detailed salary schedule to its FY25 Budget Presentation for City Council consideration. The substantive motion (moved by Bryan Doughty and seconded by Danni Cruz) failed 0-7 after extended discussion on April 29.

President Elaine Maynard-Adams and Chief Financial Officer Mr. Funk described practical and confidentiality concerns. Maynard-Adams said producing the schedule at this late date would create significant extra work and noted the district previously provided a staff-and-salary schedule without names, which City Council had rejected as insufficient. CFO Mr. Funk said preparing an accurate, up-to-date roster would take about 1.5 days and raised potential confidentiality issues around benefits and current vacancies, noting the district staffs more than 700 employees.

Vice President Bianca Alexis-Sylvain said publishing salaries could prompt workplace tensions, and Mr. Doughty characterized the Council’s late request as irresponsible and burdensome. The board discussed historical approaches—Maynard-Adams referenced a past Joint Budget Task Force that included board and council members—and suggested that committee or task-force review next year would be more appropriate than producing the detailed schedule immediately.

The motion to place a detailed salary schedule in the FY25 presentation and provide it to City Council failed 0-7. The board did not adopt a new requirement to publish employee names and salaries; members indicated any future disclosure should be considered with time to prepare accurate and legally compliant materials.