Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council holds public hearings and gives first readings to two zoning ordinances affecting the airport district and expanded commercial uses

Enumclaw City Council · May 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

In first readings, the council considered Ordinance 2837 (reducing side-yard setbacks and adjusting heights in the airport zoning district) and Ordinance 2838 (allowing arts/vocational schools, gyms and animal-care uses in certain zones and setting standards for shelters and boarding). Planning staff said the planning commission recommended approval of both measures.

The council opened two public hearings and gave first readings to separate zoning code amendments affecting the Enumclaw Airport zoning district and expanded uses in commercial and light industrial zones.

Senior planner Winston Larson presented Ordinance 2837, saying the proposal reduces minimum side-yard setbacks in the airport zoning district from 20 feet to 10 feet and amends a footnote to permit structures up to 18 feet where the airport district abuts residential zones, aligning accessory building heights with nearby residential allowances. Larson said the amendment implements parts of the city's 2024 comprehensive plan and that the planning commission recommended approval following its April public hearing.

Larson also presented Ordinance 2838, which proposes allowing arts and vocational schools, gyms and fitness centers, health studios, and animal shelters/daycare/boarding in specified commercial and light industrial districts. The ordinance would add definitions and new standards for animal-care uses (inside pens/kennels, setbacks from residences, waste-disposal requirements) to better address compatibility with adjacent residential areas. After public input (none were recorded on the record for 2838), the mayor closed the hearings and the council gave first readings of both ordinances; no final adoption votes were taken at this meeting.