Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lancaster County Council adopts FY27 budget after line-by-line cuts, approves 37 new positions
Summary
After more than three hours of line‑by‑line review and an amendment package that trimmed specific line items and reduced the proposed millage rise, Lancaster County Council approved the fiscal 2026–27 operating budget 6–1. The budget adds 37 full‑time positions and uses $36.4 million in one‑time reserves for nonrecurring items.
Lancaster County Council voted 6–1 to adopt its FY27 operating budget after extended scrutiny of line items and a consolidated amendment that reduced select expenditures and trimmed the proposed millage increase.
Budget director Jamie Pvuzznack presented the ordinance at third reading, telling council the plan included 37 new positions in the general fund and across‑the‑board salary increases of 4% for nonsworn staff and 5% for sworn public‑safety employees. Pvuzznack said the budget also appropriates $36.4 million from fund balance for one‑time, nonrecurring expenditures and sets the county operating millage at 82.7 (a total county millage of 94.1).
"There are 37 new positions added to the general fund," Pvuzznack said during the presentation, and highlighted a budget model change for emergency medical services that alters shift patterns and funds 15 new EMS positions.
Council members pressed staff on several large or poorly documented line items during the third reading. Questions focused on a $142,000 line labeled for a county nurse practitioner and a $130,000 HR contract‑services budget (both of which council members proposed reducing after staff review); legal and development review fees in planning; traffic‑impact analysis allowances; and a special projects allocation for solid‑waste convenience‑site upgrades. Several council members also asked for more clarity about which budgeted items represent recurring commitments versus once‑time uses of reserves.
Council member Stuart Graham offered a single amendment that consolidated multiple reductions, including halving the nurse/practitioner line (to roughly $70,000), trimming HR contract services, reducing the proposed traffic‑impact analysis budget from $100,000 to $50,000, and lowering certain planning and legal contingency amounts. The amendment also removed a proposed $17 minimum hourly proposal and deferred a separate salary‑study appropriation. As part of the amendment package council reduced the proposed millage increase from a planned 1.5 mills to 1.0 mill.
"We can vote at 70 knowing that if it's something that we didn't include, we just have to do a revision," a council member said during the debate, reflecting the council's acceptance of ordering amendments now and revising later if needed.
After amendments were adopted, the council voted to adopt the ordinance for FY27; the clerk recorded the final adoption vote as six in favor, one opposed. The motion to allow the coroner to negotiate hiring an in‑house medical examiner also passed unanimously in a separate motion following budget approval; staff noted additional adjustments and accounting entries would follow as hiring and contract negotiations proceed.
The adopted budget funds dozens of new positions across public safety, detention, EMS and county services, increases recurring personnel costs for raises, and relies on a mix of recurring revenues and one‑time fund‑balance appropriations. Pvuzznack said staff will return with any necessary technical amendments and any reconciliation once the final personnel and contract placements are confirmed.
The council did not vote on changes to ordinances unrelated to the budget during this item; follow‑up items and clarifications were scheduled for subsequent meetings.
