Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elementary Boundaries topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Roseville Community Schools board adopts new elementary boundaries ahead of bond vote
Summary
The Roseville Community Schools Board of Education unanimously approved newly drawn elementary-school boundaries on Oct. 21, 2025, after a presentation by Scott Sikorski; the maps are being prepared for inclusion in a proposed bond measure. No public comments were offered at the meeting.
The Roseville Community Schools Board of Education unanimously approved newly drawn elementary-school boundary maps on Oct. 21, 2025, following a presentation by Scott Sikorski and a motion by Vice President Kevin Switanowski that was seconded by Treasurer Matthew McCartney.
The move, taken at a special work‑session meeting called to examine elementary boundaries ahead of a planned bond proposal, sets the district’s current preferred boundary configuration for elementary schools. Scott Sikorski presented the maps and answered questions from board members before the board adopted the boundaries as drawn by a 7–0 vote.
Board President Theresa Genest called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. at the administration building, and Superintendent Mark Blaszkowski and central administration staff were listed as present. The minutes record that no members of the public spoke during the public‑comment portions of the agenda.
The formal motion recorded in the minutes was “to accept the new elementary boundaries as drawn.” The minutes list the motion as moved by Kevin Switanowski and supported by Matthew McCartney and record the outcome as "MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY (7-0)." The board membership recorded in the minutes for the vote included Theresa Genest (president), Kevin Switanowski (vice president), Joseph D. DeFelice (secretary), Matthew McCartney (treasurer), Gina Aiuto (trustee), Denise Brun (trustee) and Michelle Williams‑Ward (trustee).
The minutes note that the boundaries were presented “in preparation of the bond,” indicating the maps are intended to be part of planning for an upcoming bond measure; the minutes do not specify bond timing, dollar amounts, or a final public‑vote date. The meeting closed with a listing of upcoming board meetings, and the board adjourned at 8:01 p.m. after a motion by Secretary Joseph D. DeFelice, seconded by Kevin Switanowski; that adjournment motion also passed 7–0.
Next steps or any schedule for public hearings specific to the boundary maps are not specified in the meeting minutes. The minutes also do not include verbatim public testimony, alternative map versions, or board amendments to the maps; they record that the map presented was accepted "as drawn."
