Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends extending wind site conditional‑use permit to align with land leases through 2037
Summary
The Gilliam County Planning Commission voted to recommend extending an existing conditional use permit (CUP20001‑04A) for a wind energy site so the permit expiration aligns with landowner agreements that run to Dec. 31, 2037; the applicant requested no other changes and there was no public testimony.
The Gilliam County Planning Commission on a unanimous recommendation moved to extend the expiration date of a long‑standing wind‑energy conditional use permit so the permit will run through Dec. 31, 2037. Planning Director Stephanie Casease told the commission the request is limited to extending the permit’s termination date and that no other conditions are being changed.
"Tonight's action before you is file number CUP201‑04A and the request is to modify an existing approval which was approved for [the wind project] in 2001," Planning Director Stephanie Casease said, adding the only change recommended is to move the termination date from Dec. 31, 2026, to Dec. 31, 2037. Casease also noted staff corrected a typographical error in the draft findings after the applicant pointed it out.
The applicant’s representative, Bill Sawyer of Elite Clean Energy, told the commission his company purchased the site in 2014 and holds landowner lease agreements that run through 2037. "Our request tonight is to extend the conditional use permit to align with our landowner agreements so we could continue to operate the site and continue to pay our land owners for lease of their property," Sawyer said.
No members of the public testified either for or against the extension during the hearing, and staff said they had sent notice with no responses. Commissioners asked clarifying questions about the history of the permit and staff explained that prior renewals followed the same procedure and that the commission has authority to modify conditions of approval.
A motion to recommend approval of CUP20001‑04A as presented was made and seconded; commissioners voted in favor and the commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to county court for final action. The planning commission’s recommendation does not itself change permit conditions; it sends the advisory decision to the county court for the official determination.
Next steps: the county court will consider the recommendation at a noticed hearing; staff advised the planning commission and public that additional testimony may be taken at that county court proceeding.
