Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Graduation Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reviews draft local competency-determination policy after state ballot change
Summary
After state changes to the high‑school competency rule, the committee reviewed a MASC-based draft that maps local courses to state competency criteria and clarifies that competency requires both passing a course and the end-of-course assessment; members asked for clearer language on grading policy, out-of-district students and AP credit.
Committee members reviewed a draft local competency-determination policy adapted from a Massachusetts Association of School Committees (MASC) template that the administration said is intended to satisfy state requirements after voters changed the state’s previous exit-exam arrangement.
What the draft does: Policy staff explained the draft aligns current district coursework to the state competency framework and sets the district practice that a student meets a competency if they both pass the locally aligned course and demonstrate mastery on the end-of-course assessment (which may be an exam, portfolio, capstone or other summative performance).
Key clarifications requested: Several members asked for plain-language definitions. One member argued the draft relies on a referenced district grading policy that does not yet exist, saying bluntly, "We have no grading policy. So that needs to change." The committee asked the administration to explicitly define "end-of-course assessment" in the policy text (confirming that evidence of mastery is intended to be the combination of course credit plus the course assessment) and to spell out how out-of-district special-education placements will be treated.
AP, ACE and special cases: Members asked whether Advanced Placement scores or alternative assessments could count as evidence of mastery; staff noted that AP typically occurs later or for specific student pathways and that the draft focuses on named course codes aligned to the state's framework. The committee also discussed grandfathering/transcript language for students who had been enrolled when the state requirement differed.
Next steps and timeline: Staff set a public hearing on the draft at the committee’s next meeting so the community can comment; Julie (curriculum/staff lead) will bring a fuller graduation-requirements discussion in December. The policy will return to the committee for revisions after the public hearing.
