Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Firehouse Building Committee advances design work with TSKP, flags floodplain and funding limits
Summary
The Deep River Firehouse Building Committee moved the project into a programming phase with TSKP Studios, discussed site constraints including a floodplain and a 7-acre elementary school parcel, and reviewed a preliminary 2–3 month burn-rate estimate of roughly $50,000; land purchase was noted as not covered by referendum funds.
The Deep River Firehouse Building Committee agreed April 2 to begin a programming phase with TSKP Studios to assess space needs and site test fits as part of planning for either renovation or new construction of a firehouse.
TSKP representatives said contract revisions are nearly complete and that the combined programming and test-fit work is expected to take about 50 business days, covering program development, a space-needs assessment and site development/test fits. The committee listed next steps as a building walkthrough, operational review, preliminary layouts, and a budget stress test to model costs.
Committee members raised site constraints during discussion. The group considered town-owned parcels, including a seven-acre elementary school site, and the possibility of locating next to the current firehouse; the latter option prompted concern because the site is in a floodplain. The committee noted that grants may be available if the project is sited outside the floodplain.
On project funding, the committee reported that the Board of Finance requested an updated burn-rate estimate. The committee estimated a two- to three-month burn rate of about $50,000 and said the project funding was previously approved by referendum. The committee also noted that the referendum funds do not cover purchase of new land and that any land purchase would require approval at a town meeting.
The committee reviewed options for renovation versus new construction. Renovation was flagged as likely to require temporary accommodations for operations during construction; a new-construction concept discussed in general terms included a potential five-bay layout. The committee asked TSKP to include vehicle hierarchy and apparatus needs in the preliminary program.
Committee administrative items included one open alternate seat, a postponed nomination and vote for secretary until all members are present, and efforts to centralize project documents in a shared folder accessible to members. The committee also scheduled outreach with the Valley Courier (article deadline set for 5 p.m. the following day) and agreed to add a public comment period to future agendas. A possible meeting with the Historical Society president was also discussed to review site implications.
The meeting concluded at 7:00 p.m. after a motion to adjourn by Miriam Morrissey, seconded by Tim Lee.
