Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CPC presses for post‑tension concrete after Recreation Department seeks material flexibility for Ride Out Park courts
Summary
Members of Concord’s Community Preservation Committee expressed concern that a request from the recreation department to use alternative, lower‑cost materials for Ride Out Park courts would undercut the post‑tension concrete originally promised to deliver a 30‑year life; the committee asked for updated bids and signaled it expects the longer‑lasting material unless applicants return with a narrowly defined, material‑neutral justification.
The Concord Community Preservation Committee on May 19 pressed the Recreation Department to stick with post‑tension concrete for the Ride Out Park courts renovation, saying the material was a key reason the project won CPC support and that switching to a shorter‑lived surface would risk repeating the cycle of frequent repairs.
Eve (Chair) said the committee’s expectation is clear: “We want our post‑tension concrete 30‑year courts that we were advertised.” Matt Boger, representing the Recreation Commission, told the panel that contractors have reported sharply higher material costs and that bids were expected soon; he said the department intends to seek competitive quotes and lock prices quickly if possible.
Committee members weighed two concerns. Several members, including Burton Flint and Jeff Collins, warned that approving a broad material‑flexibility request would set a precedent by allowing applicants to use CPC funds for different finishes or scopes than those presented at Town Meeting. Others, including Diane (select board appointee), said that if bids show an unavoidable shortfall, the applicant should be allowed to return with updated numbers or reapply for supplemental funds rather than be reimbursed for a product that does not deliver the longevity promised to voters.
The committee asked staff to request current contractor bids and cost estimates from the Recreation Department and to relay the panel’s expectation that CPC funds be used to secure the long‑life post‑tension concrete unless the applicant demonstrates a narrow, documented reason to change. No formal vote was taken on the application during the meeting.
The Ride Out Park project had requested roughly $497,000 in CPC support toward post‑tension concrete surfacing. Committee members repeatedly noted the original application framed the funding as an investment in a multi‑decade surface; several said that a 10‑year surface financed at the same level would be “pennywise and pound foolish.”
Next steps: staff will ask the Recreation Department for updated bids and an explanation of any shortage; the applicant may return to the CPC with a revised request once quotes are in hand.
