Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Quorum Court approves multiple budget transfers and courthouse repairs; one ordinance fails

Quorum Court of Marion County, Arkansas · June 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Marion County Quorum Court approved several budget amendments — including transfers for road restriping, a $18,699.99 court security grant, vehicle purchases and courthouse HVAC/window repairs — and processed two clerk office items. A separate measure to codify supplemental revenue obligations failed for lack of a second.

The Marion County Quorum Court approved a series of budget amendments and appropriations at its meeting, authorizing transfers for road restriping, court security, vehicle purchases and courthouse repairs while a separate ordinance to codify supplemental revenue obligations failed for lack of a second.

The court enacted Ordinance 2025-56 to transfer unappropriated funds from the additional motor fuel tax fund to pay for restriping county roads. Separately, the court appropriated $18,699.99 from the court security fund (3555) to the court security complex fund (3555-0120) after a member noted the county had received a check for that grant. Members also approved a transfer from the sales tax county road fund (1801) to the vehicles line (1801-0200-4005) for vehicle purchases.

An ordinance transferring money from a 3601HP grant to the county building improvements fund (for repairs to the clerk’s windows and installation of HVAC on the courthouse main floor and basement) was approved. Two administrative items brought on behalf of the clerk’s office — a jury per diem item and a $900 part-time election pay item — were also processed.

A proposed ordinance to codify the county’s use of supplemental revenue as a county general fund obligation was introduced but failed for lack of a second and did not proceed to a vote.

The transcript records motions, seconds and votes for the passed ordinances but does not list individual roll-call tallies in the record. The court members agreed to review financial attachments and return to budget issues during the July meeting cycle as needed.