Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Efficiency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
PSC approves framework to continue energy-efficiency work after months of debate; technical conference ordered
Summary
Commissioners voted 4–1 to adopt a motion creating an LPSC energy-efficiency program framework, directing staff to prepare draft rules, run a technical conference and deliver final analysis for an August vote; the decision follows extensive public comment for a statewide, transparent program.
After wide public comment and competing motions, the Louisiana Public Service Commission voted 4–1 to adopt a substitute motion establishing a path to an LPSC energy-efficiency program and to direct staff to draft proposed rules and convene a technical conference for stakeholder input.
Commissioner Kusan moved the substitute, which commissioners described as incorporating components of the previously adopted Quickstart and public-entity programs while allowing staff to refine program budget, administrative-cost caps and options for broader participation. Commissioners said the motion does not pre-commit the commission to a particular third-party administrator model or vendor; rather, it directs staff to produce an apples-to-apples cost-benefit analysis and to hold technical workshops, with a target of bringing final recommendations to the August 2025 business-and-executive agenda.
Public commenters including environmental-justice groups and consumer advocates urged a statewide, transparent program with independent oversight and a carveout to protect low-income customers; trade and industry representatives stressed administrative cost control and opt-in provisions for cooperatives and industrial customers. Dr. Sally O. Donland, a Lafayette resident and attendee, told commissioners she wanted programs run for public benefit and independent oversight rather than by utilities alone.
Commissioner Lewis objected to some specifics — emphasizing concerns about capping administrative costs and co-op participation — but commissioners who supported the substitute said the technical conference will allow staff and stakeholders to explore those issues. Staff told the commission it can produce draft rules and schedule the technical conference on an expedited timetable.
The commission recorded a 4–1 vote in favor of continuing staff analysis and stakeholder engagement under the substitute framework; Commissioner Lewis cast the lone dissent.
