Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Issaquah eases upper‑level stepback and balcony rules to speed housing development; council adopts amendments 5–2
Summary
The council approved amendments loosening stepback location rules and reducing required private outdoor amenity coverage from 50% to 30% of units (and exempting small conversions) after staff and the Planning & Policy Commission recommended the changes; the measures passed 5–2.
The Issaquah City Council on June 29 adopted land‑use amendments to reduce burdens that staff and developers said were constraining housing development in the city's core. The ordinances adjust upper‑level stepback requirements and shrink some private outdoor amenity triggers.
Key changes adopted: (1) Upper‑level stepbacks — the code will no longer require multiple stepbacks along every façade or in natural‑context areas; instead developers must provide a single street‑facing stepback of five feet depth placed between the base of floor two and up to the base of floor six, and staff described a menu of architectural styles allowed under the central Issaquah design rules. The change is intended to give builders flexibility on where modulation occurs while preserving a degree of massing variation in the public realm.
(2) Outdoor amenity space — the minimum requirement for balconies or private outdoor spaces dropped from 50% of units to 30% (an outright permitted reduction rather than a deviation process). Conversions of commercial buildings to residential are granted flexibility on outdoor space to allow reuse of glass‑clad and other structures that cannot easily accept balconies. Small multifamily projects of up to nine units are exempted from certain common‑area amenity requirements.
The Planning & Policy Commission and the Planning, Development & Environment committee reviewed the packages before the council. Committee members expressed differing views on whether the city should remove stepback requirements entirely or pursue a broader menu‑driven design standard; the adopted ordinance reflects a compromise that reduces stepback burden while retaining a single street‑facing requirement.
Council debate included requests for more study and a broader menu of architectural options; Council Members Martz and Nichols voted no, citing a desire to examine the full range of options (including the possibility of eliminating stepbacks) before changing the code. The ordinances passed 5–2.
What happens next: The amendments become effective five days after publication. Staff said a follow‑up work stream on architectural standards (a broader menu of options and objective design criteria) is scheduled for later in 2026 to guide future code refinements.
