Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Superintendent Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carson City‑Crystal board accepts superintendent’s mid‑year progress report
Summary
The Carson City‑Crystal MS/HS Board on Jan. 21 accepted Superintendent John Sattler’s mid‑year progress report, noting a 56.9% fund balance, K–3 academic growth above the 5% goal, hiring of a full‑time college‑and‑career advisor and plans for further 4–8 data review and career programming.
The Carson City‑Crystal MS/HS Board of Education on Jan. 21 accepted Superintendent John Sattler’s mid‑year progress report, approving the document by a 5–0 roll call vote.
Superintendent John Sattler told the board the district has substantially exceeded its finance target, reporting a 56.9% fund balance compared with the board’s 20% goal and an unmodified audit opinion from Hungerford. The board received the report as the formal mid‑year checkpoint on performance goals.
Principal Mrs. Manzullo reported that K–3 students have already surpassed the board’s academic growth target of 5% in both reading and math; Principal Ms. Shaver is scheduled to present 4–8 I‑Ready results at the February meeting and Tiffany Ryan will present Title reading data in April. On college and career work, Sattler said the district hired Kelsey Peterson as a full‑time college and career advisor and plans to resume a career fair to expand student opportunities.
Board members asked clarifying questions about operational details. Board member S. Fleisher asked whether students enrolled at the FBA facility are eligible for CC‑C athletics; Sattler explained the district’s eligibility rule requires students to take at least 66% of their classes at Carson City‑Crystal, and that classes taught by teachers the district funds at the FBA building count toward that threshold.
The board voted to accept the mid‑year progress report on a motion by S. Fleisher, supported by S. Springsteen. The roll call vote was S. Springsteen — yes; S. Fleisher — yes; R. Lankford — yes; M. Staff — yes; M. Jensen — yes. Earlier in the meeting the board also approved the agenda (motion by S. Fleisher, supported by M. Staff) and adjourned at 6:34 p.m.
Board members identified next steps including review of 4–8 assessment data, consideration of any board training from the Michigan Association of School Boards, and continued development of artifacts and metrics to evaluate year‑end progress.
