Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Family Resource Center topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews Family Resource Center governance, recommends further study of bylaws and oversight
Summary
Board members reviewed a 2013 program study and debated whether the school board should assume advisory oversight of the Family Resource Center, noting outdated bylaws that call for a 12‑member advisory board and concerns about long‑term sustainability.
Board members discussed the Family Resource Center (FRC) during new business after a memo from Patrick summarized operations and a program review completed in December 2013. Patrick said the center remains valuable to the community but that governance documents and oversight practices need updating to ensure sustainability.
Patrick told the board the FRC’s bylaws still specify a 12‑member advisory board, but recent years have seen far fewer volunteers and some towns have absorbed similar boards into municipal structures. “If we’re looking at the long‑term sustainability of the program, there should be oversight,” he said, recommending updated job descriptions, review of the director’s contract and integration of FRC oversight into curriculum and finance subcommittees as possible approaches.
Board members raised several concerns. One member asked whether changes would require Department of Education or grant-related approvals; Patrick said he had not yet contacted the state and would investigate the steps needed and report back. Another member said the board should solicit input from current FRC participants (parents and staff) before finalizing bylaw changes; others noted repeated difficulty recruiting parents to serve on the advisory board.
Norine volunteered to help organize initial work and meet with FRC staff to gather background; Patrick agreed to meet with the center’s director and share a task list for immediate priorities. The board did not vote on a formal governance change but asked administration to gather more information, including whether prior town examples required state notification.
Clarifying details discussed in the meeting included: the last formal program review dating from December 2013, the FRC’s bylaws calling for a 12‑member advisory board, reported difficulty recruiting volunteers for that body, and current meal programs at the FRC being covered by free lunch and breakfast funding.
Next steps: Patrick will meet with FRC leadership, collect answers about grant compliance and bylaw requirements, and present a summary of recommended tasks and a timeline for the board to review at a future meeting.
