Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bond 2020 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
East China board approves $5.38 million in elementary renovation contracts under Bond 2020
Summary
The East China School District Board of Education voted 5–0 to award a package of contracts for Palms, Belle River and Pine River elementary renovations under Bond 2020, approving individual proposals that together total $5,377,692.
Get email alerts on the Bond 2020 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The East China School District Board of Education voted unanimously Nov. 17 to award a series of construction contracts for renovations at Palms, Belle River and Pine River elementary schools under its Bond 2020 program.
Vice President Karen Cedar moved the approval of the contractor proposals and Jamie Haslem seconded; the motion carried 5–0 with two members absent. The motion listed specific proposal awards by trade, including electrical work, HVAC, plumbing, glazing, flooring, casework and structural steel. The board record lists awards to Brenner Contracting (DBA Brenner Electric) for $2,031,500; Watson Bros. for $1,648,000; Daniels Glass for $227,476; Diversified Construction Specialties for $312,971; Floorcraft for $241,823; DKI International for $215,800; FCI for $183,582; Contrast Mechanical for $217,000; Continental Contracting for painting and fluid applied flooring ($172,180 and $45,246 respectively); Campbell & Shaw for structural and miscellaneous steel ($31,375); HMC Masonry for masonry ($30,100); and D10 USA for toilet partitions and accessories ($20,639). The listed awards total $5,377,692.
Board members did not request postponement and approved the full package during the meeting. Lisa Bondy of AUCH General Construction later provided a separate Bond 2020 status update, including a summer overview of work at the three elementary sites and an update on Marine City baseball fields.
The board record does not list contract start dates or scheduled completion milestones; those details were not specified during the public meeting. The vote was recorded as Yea: 5, Nay: 0, Absent: 2. The board did not debate individual contractor qualifications on the record at the Nov. 17 meeting; the motion was presented as a grouped package of proposals.
