Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a glance: Planning & Zoning votes May 6 — developer plans advance; a homeowner sidewalk variance denied
Summary
At the May 6 meeting the Hebron Planning & Zoning Board approved several variances and site plans (Woodspring Suites, Ohio Valley, Vance Outdoors), approved rezoning for a dental‑to‑clinic conversion, and approved M/I Homes’ preliminary PRD with conditions; it denied a homeowner’s request to avoid installing a sidewalk at 125 Dennison Street.
The Village of Hebron Planning & Zoning Board took multiple formal actions at its May 6 regular meeting.
Key votes and outcomes: - Sidewalk variance denied: The board voted to deny Clifford Mason’s variance to eliminate a sidewalk at 125 Dennison Street. An initial motion to approve failed; a subsequent motion to deny passed on roll call. - Woodspring Suites: The board approved a variance to eliminate a loading area requirement for an Arrowhead Boulevard hotel, and later approved the hotel’s final site plan with conditions tied to fire suppression sign‑off and a forthcoming parking variance. - Ohio Valley Cabinets: The board added the Ohio Valley final site plan to the agenda (by amendment) and approved the final plan as presented. - Vance Outdoors: Two wall‑sign variances for 150 Arrowhead Boulevard were approved; staff noted the signs meet size and font standards but require a variance when a building has multiple wall signs. - Rezoning: The Board recommended approval to rezone 820 West Main Street and 104 North 9th Street from R1 to GC so the property can operate as a behavioral clinic serving children with autism. - M/I Homes — Hebron Landing: The Board approved the preliminary PRD for a 129‑lot single‑family neighborhood with conditions requiring a wetlands determination, agreed buffers/barriers where lots back to farmland (including stub‑street controls), and measures addressing nearby well/tank safety prior to final approval.
Board members said these approvals do not replace required engineering, permitting and final plan review. For example, staff and consultants reiterated that detailed stormwater engineering (including 100‑year/1% event calculations) and fire suppression approvals remain necessary for final sign‑off. The Board’s motions were recorded by roll call and are included in the official minutes.
The Board scheduled follow‑up review and expects developers to return with finalized engineering and any required variances at future meetings.
