Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents praise water carnival, raise concerns about grants, trees and planning board quorum
Summary
Public commenters praised the successful water carnival and thanked township staff, while raising multiple concerns: a housing rehab grant discharge language (613 Sander Drive), tree removals at the Acme site and payment to the township tree fund, planning-board quorum and master-plan process, and requests for small improvements (dock cleats).
A wide range of public commenters addressed council during the July 1 meeting, combining gratitude for recent community events with pointed questions and complaints about township administration and development.
Marty Graffinger, president of the Browns Mills Improvement Association, praised volunteers and township staff for a well-run water carnival and requested installing cleats on the H dock to accommodate approximately five pontoon boats during community events. He also announced a candidates forum and upcoming planning meetings.
Vicky Adams (613 Sander Drive) reported frustration with the township's handling of her $20,000 rehab grant and a subsequent lien she discovered when refinancing. She pointed to Resolution 20326, which authorizes the mayor to execute a discharge of mortgage for her property, and asked that the resolution language be rephrased so it does not imply she received special treatment; staff confirmed the resolution references a discharge but the precise wording was a concern for the commenter.
Other residents raised repeated planning-board concerns, including Tracy Ricardelli and Michelle Foreman, who complained about low attendance at key master-plan meetings and urged more transparency and public notice (suggesting meetings be streamed). Tom Boyd and township staff explained that the Acme site plan had authorized tree removal and that the developer paid $700 per acre into the township tree fund; the total acreage and amount paid were not specified at the meeting.
Council members and staff promised to follow up on the specific requests: staff said they would check the wording of the mortgage-discharge resolution, verify tree-fund payments and provide GIS maps and site-plan documents for public review, and investigate the H-dock cleat request and building maintenance items raised by commenters.
