Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts development-code amendments after CEQA exemption debate
Summary
Ontario City Council approved a multi-chapter development code amendment (PDCA25-003) that revises procedures, permits and land-use rules, voting 5–0 after public comment and legal staff noted additions to the record and proponents and opponents debated whether a CEQA "common-sense" exemption applies.
The Ontario City Council voted unanimously to adopt a multi-chapter development code amendment (file PDCA25-003) that revises administrative, permit, zoning and historic preservation provisions for the city.
The council closed a noticed public hearing after staff confirmed affidavits of compliance and distribution of supplemental pages to the council packet. The city attorney noted proposed additions to page 10 of the staff materials were available for public review. After public discussion, Councilmember Bowman moved to adopt the ordinance as presented and a second was recorded; the electronic vote carried 5–0.
Opponents during public comment, including attorney Sisson (S15) and Juan Munoz of Unite Here Local 11 (S16), urged the council to deny the code changes or require additional environmental review. Sisson told the council the staff relied on a CEQA "common-sense" exemption that "is very defeatable, even with a reasonable expectation of impacts" and warned the proposed hotel exemptions and increased administrative (ministerial) approvals could allow projects to proceed without the discretionary conditioning available through a conditional-use permit. Munoz said removing conditional-use requirements for some hotel types could allow uses that trigger vehicle miles traveled, greenhouse-gas and noise impacts that cannot be fully mitigated by design standards.
City Attorney commentary at the dais explained copies of the proposed page additions were placed at council desks and in the back for public inspection. The council adopted the amendment after hearing the objections and staff responses.
The action updates multiple development-code chapters and will change how some hotel and entertainment-related uses are reviewed; staff and opponents flagged potential implementation details and environmental review questions that could reappear in future project-level review.
The council recorded a 5–0 vote in favor; the ordinance will be implemented according to the schedule in the staff report and any required ministerial procedures.
