Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marquette County committee approves two rezones and forwards them to County Board
Summary
The Marquette County Planning & Zoning Committee approved two rezone requests—one for Darcy and Jeffrey Rataczak and one for Timothy and Gina McReath—and forwarded both to the County Board after noting Town Board and Plan Commission approvals and adjacent-owner input.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Marquette County Planning and Zoning Committee voted April 3 to approve two rezone applications and forward both to the County Board for final action.
Planning & Zoning Administrator Jean Potter summarized an application by Darcy and Jeffrey Rataczak to reclassify a 10-acre parcel (Lot 2 CSM 3131, part of the SW ¼ of the SE ¼, Section 6, T14N R10E) from Prime Agriculture (AG-1) to General Agriculture (AG-2). Potter said the Town Board and Plan Commission supported the request; adjacent landowner Fred Wollenberg voiced support while also noting concerns. Kathy Jo Locke moved to approve and forward the rezone; Dave Benson seconded. The committee carried the motion 5-0.
Potter also presented a rezone filed by Timothy and Gina McReath for lands in Section 25, T15N R9E in the Town of Packwaukee. Under the proposal, roughly 3 acres around the existing dwelling would be reclassified to Agriculture Residential (AG-3(2)) and about 37 acres would be placed in a Farmland Preservation Overlay (FPO); a certified survey map with an easement is being prepared. Potter said the owners are selling the house and 3-acre parcel to their son and that both the Town Board and the Plan Commission approved. John Bennett moved to approve and forward the rezone; Dave Benson seconded. The motion carried 5-0.
Both applications will be considered next by the Marquette County Board. Town and Plan Commission approvals, the presence of supporting adjacent-owner comment and the certified survey work were cited in committee discussion as reasons for advancing the items.
